That’s not to say that the application in its current form has much of a future (bloated IDE, ~50% browser penetration, dwindling developer base, cross-platform projector issues) because as we all know, it hasn’t been getting a whole lot of love recently. However, it all comes down to giving people what they want. Online audiences are increasingly responding to online / portable / casual games – and the main way they are currently being delivered is with Macromedia Flash (I know it’s official by now, but Adobe Flash just doesn’t sound right for some reason).

But as much as we deny it, we’re all suckers for sexy 3D graphics, and the only way to do 3D properly online is with Director, because it (unlike Flash) supports hardware acceleration.

…so maybe the future of Director is not quite that rosy, but I am betting that the only thing that it really does uniquely (hardware accelerated 3D graphics) is alive and kicking. In the absense of any other promising platforms, I’m going to get stuck into lingo (thank the lord for javascript syntax) and take a one month actionscript-free diet.

And if it doesn’t end up working out that way, I guess I’ll see you at Centerlink!

(On the other hand, they could easily add 3D hardware acceleration to Flash, or Adobe Apollo, but I’m not holding my breath…)

References:

Director coming to Intel Macs, says Adobe